Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 17, 2018, 11:35:44 PM

Quote from: BobLawblaw on April 17, 2018, 11:34:08 PM

Quote from: conspirosphere.tk on April 17, 2018, 10:06:35 PM

He just doesn't like free speech. Should stay on reddit.

[ ] Free Speech
[ ] Reddit

Pick one.

Clearly Voat is the solution.

yeah, but what I find fun with markets is that it can stay irrational more than you solvable

meaning that it's not because reddit is a hive of censorship that there can't be jems there

.

this topic illustrate it : Reddits science forum banned climate deniers.

Quote from: Wilikon on December 17, 2013, 07:27:25 PM

[...]
As a scientist myself, it became clear to me that the contrarians were not capable of providing the science to support their skepticism on climate change. The evidence simply does not exist to justify continued denial that climate change is caused by humans and will be bad. There is always legitimate debate around the cutting edge of research, something we see regularly. But with climate change, science that has been established, constantly tested, and reaffirmed for decades was routinely called into question.

Over and over, solid peer-reviewed science was insulted as corrupt, while blog posts from fossil-fuel-funded groups were cited as objective fact. Worst of all, they didnt even get the irony of quoting oil-funded blogs that called university scientists biased.

The end result was a disservice to science and to rational exploration, not to mention the scholarly audience we are proud to have cultivated. When 97 percent of climate scientists agree that man is changing the climate, we would hope the comments would at least acknowledge if not reflect such widespread consensus. Since that was not the case, we needed more than just an ad hoc approach to correct the situation.

The answer was found in the form of proactive moderation. About a year ago, we moderators became increasingly stringent with deniers. When a potentially controversial submission was posted, a warning would be issued stating the rules for comments (most importantly that your comment isnt a conspiracy theory) and advising that further violations of the rules could result in the commenter being banned from the forum.

http://grist.org/climate-energy/reddits-science-forum-banned-climate-deniers-why-dont-all-newspapers-do-the-same/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
In other scientific news CRYOSAT SATELLITE FINDS ARCTIC ICE INCREASED 50% IN VOLUME

Around 90 per cent of the increase is due to retention of older ice
This years multi-year ice is now around 30 cm thicker than last year
Experts claim increase does not indicate a reversal in long-term trends

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2524770/ESA-satellite-reveals-polar-ice-INCREASED-50-year.html

it wasn't even merited, from 2013

obama started the total censorship very early in his watch, as soon as DJT asked a simple question. I know where DJT was born and raised... more exactly, I learn from him when he speaks about it... but I don't need to proof any of that... I believe him

.

obama started his total censorship campaign with a french satire... strange how it went hebdo later on...

someone wanted to spill the bean on the guidestonians?

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on April 18, 2018, 01:38:33 AM

There a couple of possibilities here.

We either have a minimum standard of behaviour (no genocide allowed) or we can fork the thread. I dont doubt our good moderator has the best of intentions but it is embarrassing to be associated with some of this stuff, even if only anonymously. Aint nobody got time for Stormfront Word Salad.

why do you believe your opinion is worth writting? did someone do it for you? hehehe. loser.