Quote from: chup on April 17, 2018, 07:00:17 AM

Quote from: MiCoSa on April 16, 2018, 05:20:58 PM

Quote from: aerodynomic on April 16, 2018, 04:04:48 PM

Those numbers dictate the weighting the Pool uses when determining which pools to show you as Alive. If you have Nist5=1.2, it a multipler for avg mBTC/day. So say Nist5 is earning .002 per day and Qubit is earning .002 per day. If you have NIst5 as 1.2 then its effective Btc per day is .0024 Where as Qubit would be 1* .002 or .002. I use this flag and favor Nist5 more because it draws less power. Therefore even if Nist5 and Qubit are both supposed to make .002 really Nist5 would make more once you subtract electric costs. For instance Skein is .5 because the X10 only has 5GH/s of hashing power but online it shows Skein as earning .0035 per day which would be true if our machines could hit 10GH\s.

Does that help?

I dont think, that this help, because it is totally wrong...

Well, I think it is totally right. Now what?

If this would be right, well it would be a great thing (or maybe not). Just set Nist5=100 and your earnings would be 100 * 0,002 = 0,2 BTC per day. Or set it 1000 and you have 0,002 * 1000 = 2 BTC per day...

Sorry but this part is totally nonsense...

It is not a multiplier, it is just a weighting for the different algos. The second part is at least better, as you can use this weightings to prefer the algos with lower electricity consumption... But there are also faults...