Quote from: Abies on April 20, 2018, 01:39:49 AM

What happen to the blockchain?

https://blockexplorer.graft.network/

height   age [h:m:s]   size [kB]   tx hash   fees   outputs   in(nonrct)/out   ring size   tx size [kB]
65940   01:27:56   0.12   8730a4129b067d1c97dc61930b6f5b49b13bd5fedac5780ad1cafec98beaf496   N/A   1706.446   0(0)/1   N/A   0.12
65939   00:32:51   158.34   603e2cf025b1d22991a2b8a5d9ed822db2d4cb95f7912ef0bb1da4942a738210   N/A   1710.818   0(0)/1   N/A   0.10

block 65940 is older than block 65939.

[edit] block 65940's age was decreased and increasing now(see below).

65941   01:52:37   227.17   53674b9a40f1a31957770dd96ad62fc3965ec3d021c0a8e15f91bc3ffd41f9aa   N/A   1708.027   0(0)/1   N/A   0.10
2902f5c7b0807608e2ff6ba3a1415881abca2e21e8411fdaba1efd9d5fef2a21   0.096   ?   2(0)/2   5   13.21
b98d52d89a0b46ca15655119561e6e7ccc9b135ae5fd8597d62680c44f49f702   0.096   ?   2(0)/2   5   13.21
453ee6291ee54a015b160f99fe1ac6361c39964f47f70e394685fde9d702686d   0.096   ?   2(0)/2   5   13.21
b1939466f56fdb1b8e856df83f495f13f57a6118b6d3af23b19badfb0bf45ced   0.096   ?   2(0)/2   5   13.21
c993550c79cbdc9c0edb10ea170e59938ae493d27cd71056fe4749f700d7fe71   0.096   ?   2(0)/2   5   13.21
5557833471584bfcaf0cf29ea1eecd623b4e2613b9ed0c7ac05c05cc1fe3067a   1.106   ?   2(0)/26   5   161.00
65940   00:00:24   0.12   8730a4129b067d1c97dc61930b6f5b49b13bd5fedac5780ad1cafec98beaf496   N/A   1706.446   0(0)/1   N/A   0.12
65939   02:01:11   158.34   603e2cf025b1d22991a2b8a5d9ed822db2d4cb95f7912ef0bb1da4942a738210   N/A   1710.818   0(0)/1   N/A   0.10

Can you check the blockexplorer?

I found the odd ones below.(please, see the ages)

65912   01:42:38   0.09   5e8ca460e2045ef048123abd4a5f41eba31b9990a4836a48464b47240fadb922   N/A   1706.537   0(0)/1   N/A   0.09
65911   00:16:06   145.33   d1c0aeffbef5ed71a49f9db31938d1e2ba77c06d6b7f72c15429d225636d07fa   N/A   1707.551   0(0)/1   N/A   0.12
1576ee22969bfed50a58b085d274b113c8c039ccc559cc6e8a102d494126c98b   0.096   ?   2(0)/2   5   13.21
d6caf4073c1f3776bf537903fe5ae2f271e14da88387cd9e111679d2a458b9dd   0.096   ?   2(0)/2   5   13.21
4e6584bcc306e9085ccc912e48850082aebb533970ba9ba62e7590ab2f8dd8ee   0.096   ?   2(0)/2   5   13.21
44a8e91842c515196cc2c74f9e953662c64988cc95a20738702b8163ce97c04a   0.724   ?   2(0)/17   5   105.58
65910   00:15:00   0.12   373f631138e70a4c19de91ad468f50f3102593dc49e139a53eb74883ac3f50fd   N/A   1706.544   0(0)/1   N/A   0.12
65909   01:44:08   0.10   94cf8101e11dc6989b0df885c04267f1406914193cffa464acd7486ab32a49eb   N/A   1706.547   0(0)/1   N/A   0.10

Keep clock drift in mind. Take the timestamps of the previous 10/11 blocks to calculate clock drift (and validate) Median TS and you can see that the blocks are valid and that it's working as designed. Unless I'm totally wrong, then I'm open to correction (but I've seen this before).