Quote from: scarce on November 10, 2013, 08:07:31 AM

Quote from: bitcoin.newsfeed on November 10, 2013, 07:06:49 AM

Guys just a little speculation for you Wink

enjoy

Yesterday the AM mined 5blocks from 44 ... in timeframe from ~12:00 to ~19:00, so it was ~1/9 of whole network ... the network hashrate is estimated to be around 3.5 Ph so the 1/9 is around 388Th , we had around 88 before so here we have extra ~300 Th ... i did some calculations and here is the speculation : On one of the photos in immersion cooling exhibition we see 4 dry coolers, so lets assume the power of 4 containers... for one container its 5000 gen1 blades each 10-12Gh, so full container of Gen1 blades is hashing around 60 Th, for 300 Th we need 5 containers plugged & hashing, its close to 4, right? So why they was mining only couple of hours?

I don't believe in this kind of luck. The time between blocks was constant and we mined so many block in relatively short time period like we're mining per week.

To support your speculation, let's think what's in the following pics:

My speculation is, that's many containers of blades with immersion cooling put into racks. I don't know how many of them are actually filled with blades, but all FC now need to do, is start filling them up. The dry coolers you mentioned are inevitable part of it, too. So turning on some of these would easily get us your mentioned hashrate. I hope we will finally see some AM hashrate's rise soon.

I think that every single rack might be filled with gen1 at the moment and here is why.

I found that each row has 92 blades and each rack has 3 rows with 20 racks. Assuming the blades are getting around 13gh/s per you would get:

13 x 92 x 3 x 20 = 71,760 which is pretty close to what FC said AM was hashing at (I think he said previously 67th/s).