Minting is ongoing and will be completed for most users this week. We're orchestrating the exchanges right now to have a common launch date, so it's more there call than ours. Btw that's also what most admins answer and they're definitely not stupid.

Still all exchanges on board that agreed to list you? If you think through this out of their perspective and after your PR-Stunt: It wouldn't be that surprising if they are unsure if they want to be associated with such a move.
Btw, there is the theory out there that it wasn't just a "Prank-Exit-Scam" but that you guys tried to execute it and backed off because you got scared and that the explanation and "making-of" a day later was just a cover up. I know that's not true, because you were not even able to move money. But your problem now is that none of the results are in your favor:
- some still believe it was an exit-scam (realized), because the first message (and it's gone, over and out) was more powerful than everything what came after
- some are informed and consider it as stupid and irresponsible
- some believe it was a failed scam, like said above
- near to zero positive feedback.
Another btw: What I thought about is how you guys pulled that off, how it was discussed and planned in your team before. I can't know it, but I think it's unlikely that everybody agreed and believed that to be a smart move. Assumed I'm right, there is something I additionally find irresponsible: Those who didn't agree and expressed their concerns were pushed in an impossible situation without any good option. Actually they only had the options to participate or to quit. Theoretically everybody could have stopped it by saying "If you really want to pull that off, I'll make it public before" (whistleblowing). And the paradox here is: In that case it wouldn't have happened and that would have been better for Savedroid. They would have rescued it. But: Because it wouldn't have happened they wouldn't have any proof to be right. Those who believed the "Hoax-strategy" would be a smart move could have seen that as betrayal, blaming the person who avoided the disaster.
If you think about that... creating such a situation of pressure and without any good option for those who actually disagreed is already irresponsible against the own people.
Of course there is also the scenario that everybody on your team believed it to be a great idea right away. But actually that would be the worst scenario.