Quote from: alucard20724 on April 26, 2018, 03:12:36 AM

Quote from: janding on April 26, 2018, 02:29:47 AM

Quote from: ollis miner on April 25, 2018, 11:24:56 PM

Quote from: bbkoopsta on April 25, 2018, 11:10:25 PM

Quote from: ollis miner on April 23, 2018, 10:53:46 PM

Quote from: ollis miner on April 23, 2018, 09:35:51 PM

Quote from: rigomortis on April 23, 2018, 09:26:43 PM

PSA:

Seems like all new version of Claymore never can reach the reported effective hashrate. If you guys want more shares.. use v9.8. All newer version are skimming more shares. Claymore just getting his share guys..

Don't believe you. He has always been updating this SW to please us users.
Can you proof that the 9.8 version is better than 11.x ?

@rigomortis
Just rolled back one of my rigs to v9.8 with the same dcri suggestions as 11.7 did. Going to try it for 24h to see if you are correct - or full of bs... Time will show

Ollis

Hi can you update us on the fact that rigomortis claims are true or not considering less shares?!

Did run for 30+ hours. And rolled back to 11.7. No significant difference. Just BS...
I'm 14 trying to stack some money for my education. This guy probably 47. And fat. And single. And doesn't wan't to pay decent devfee to a good programmer like Claymore...

Wow 47, that's really old. Do you think he's really THAT old ?
I mean, he probably can't even use a iPhone at that age.

I'm dying here with that response... Grin

I use the older versions also on some rigs. Basically unless you want to dual mine the new algos or you are getting no tempeatures then you should use the newer versions. But the ETH is identical between versions 9.8 and 11.x or so.

The way that Daggerhash is coded is very difficult to make it any faster. Pretty much even the original Ethminer by the ETH dev core team is more or less the same speed.

However Claymore is more stable and has more monitoring features.