Quote from: MPOE-PR on November 13, 2013, 12:39:41 PM

Quote from: superbit on November 13, 2013, 01:57:33 AM

I have no idea if you are right or wrong here. I can say that I have had money in this site and have never had any problems collecting interest and getting money wired to my personal bank account. Never had issues buying BTC and sending it either.

However, you were right on labcoin, it just seems like you come in here with allegations and no hard proof, and as stated in the case of labcoin you were correct and saved me some $$

But wouldn't it be better for you to offer constructive feedback. For example, let's say that it is not a scam, what kind of proof / documents would you like to be seen? For all we know there is something that can be provided that would give us a bitcoin success story to talk about.

Scam warnings are a great thing for the community, but better feedback will help the community learn what to look for in certain situations.

Just my $0.02, thanks for reading.

Those who act according to the habits and principles of scammers, whether because of their own deliberate intention to scam, or through their ignorance of how to act in a manner consistent with honesty and professionalism (and especially in spite of being told what they'd need to do to comply with this), shall be treated as scammers.

The "community", inasmuch as you mean forum users here who insist on not reading or glossing over what I say because it's too long, too painful, or includes words they don't like or don't understand and won't learn, would know precisely what to look for simply by reading my post history. It's been said countless times. It's been listed by numbers, it's been argued and substantiated. People who don't want to read still don't want to read, people who aren't threatened by it learn and go on to master the ownership of their coins, what can I say.

Reject the actual evidence brought in favor of some mystical "hard proof" at your own peril. I understand the world'd be easier to navigate if things were put into your preferred form and fit your expectations of what things ought to look like, but we're not here to make things easier for everyone. We're here to do things correctly.

Please point out where this was done. I've done a ton of reading, I see the allegations. I have acted accordingly, as I said you saved me $ on labcoin, but the bolded statement above suggests there was constructive criticism given on this issue, please point me to the post where you suggest what they should do instead of just pointing out the flaws.