You have already received multiple merit from multiple users, therefore this doesn't really fit my criteria of "under-merited". Also, I've seen many threads like this already made, and I believe I have one or two on my Watchlist as we speak. With that being said, I will not be giving your submission any merit at this time.


Very bland and boring post. I don't want to give merit out for discussing bounties, airdrops or signature campaigns. It doesn't seem like the right kind of material to be giving merit.


I've added your first submission to my Watchlist, and if I have to reference it in the future then I will slide you a merit point at that time. For now though, you've already received multiple merit from multiple users so it doesn't really fit my criteria. It is a very well written post, it is informative, but since it's already received merit it will have to wait until it becomes something I reference. Your second submission is the same way. I would be giving these merit if they hadn't already earned as much as they have. Don't want to run out of merit quickly, so this is a rule for the safety of my merit; you'd be taking them all away otherwise.

There you go, I've given your third submission a Merit, because I was unaware of 80%/17th million coin being mined and this was very interesting to me. There are some interesting implications that this will have on mining, supply/demand and all of that good stuff. I'll be jumping in your thread if I think of anything worth saying.