Quote from: Coolcryptovator on April 27, 2018, 08:36:56 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3398258.msg35581620#msg35581620

You have already received multiple merit from multiple users, therefore this doesn't really fit my criteria of "under-merited". Also, I've seen many threads like this already made, and I believe I have one or two on my Watchlist as we speak. With that being said, I will not be giving your submission any merit at this time.

Quote from: hassick on April 27, 2018, 10:56:20 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3404829.msg35707823#msg35707823

Very bland and boring post. I don't want to give merit out for discussing bounties, airdrops or signature campaigns. It doesn't seem like the right kind of material to be giving merit.

Quote from: bitmover on April 27, 2018, 12:23:44 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3285767.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3317586.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3414598.0

I've added your first submission to my Watchlist, and if I have to reference it in the future then I will slide you a merit point at that time. For now though, you've already received multiple merit from multiple users so it doesn't really fit my criteria. It is a very well written post, it is informative, but since it's already received merit it will have to wait until it becomes something I reference. Your second submission is the same way. I would be giving these merit if they hadn't already earned as much as they have. Don't want to run out of merit quickly, so this is a rule for the safety of my merit; you'd be taking them all away otherwise. Sad

There you go, I've given your third submission a Merit, because I was unaware of 80%/17th million coin being mined and this was very interesting to me. There are some interesting implications that this will have on mining, supply/demand and all of that good stuff. I'll be jumping in your thread if I think of anything worth saying.