Quote from: kraterion on May 02, 2018, 04:48:29 PM

Quote from: fadzinator on May 01, 2018, 09:56:37 PM

Quote from: nicksnn on May 01, 2018, 07:04:16 PM

eth classic's smartcontract's will be the same as ethereum? Or it will be worst/better?

Probably yes.. since they have same core source code...
probably.

As far as I remember Dexaran (Ethereum Commonwealth) wanted to use another language, Viper because it's more secure.

Found a quote of Dexaran himslef: "We all know that smart-contracts are often hacked. It is caused by problems of Solidity programming language. As a smart-contract auditor I can say that Viper could significantly improve readability of smart-contracts and boost their safety."

ETH is completely overhyped. the marketing seems to be well financed as every poopoo that is just in the brains of devs is promoted as if it is a new finished feature (https://www.coindesk.com/new-ideas-energize-ethereum-though-true-signaling-solution-still-elusive/), wtf. the current smart contract mentality in a lawyer's world is like signing contracts that are not available when signing or they are written in a language that the signatory doesn't speak/is able to read, who will except of some nerds and ethereum shills use and more important trust them?

I think ETC's m2m IOT focused direction is the way to go, no hype, steady development and contracts that are written and tested by pros and not people that can c&p a erc20 token and replace some strings in it