So no one thinks that there is an exceptional counting culture of bounty manager's stakes to justify his counting? Then this seems a scam. Last time, his excuse for the 30 source merit abuse were very poor and never satisfactory, and this time there should be no room to excuse this scam in any way.

I just saw that merit sources were reduced from 80 to 79 (I thought that might be he was removed).

I think that might have been digaran, who said he resigned as a merit source.

Correct:

Quote from: digaran on April 29, 2018, 04:14:38 AM

As of this moment I'm no longer a merit source. there was too much drama and clearly I wasn't trustworthy enough. I was unfit to represent this forum and the community. I have resigned.

I thought it was Anon11073 who was resigned, but he is still a merit source! Anyway I think now he should go away from the forum...

Quote from: mdayonliner on May 02, 2018, 08:03:56 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on May 02, 2018, 07:17:21 PM

My suggestion: "Bounty manager (Staff!) embezzling $4000".

I do think the same like you. May be the title needs a bit of tweaks.

Thanks for suggestion, I edited the title. Eventually I may need to include his username explicitly to avoid further scam victims.

Quote from: jumbo on May 02, 2018, 09:44:27 PM

This ICO is an registered HK business, and they may press charges, since that's their promised prizes or other benefits for participants of promotional campaign were obtained by a fraudster with the use of deceit. Technically it shall count as theft and/or fraud in HK. I would recommend contacting their ICO CEO and their Legal Advisor to report that incident. Also, their reaction will tell a lot about the status and position of that person in their ranks.

Great, I am still new to this field and not familiar with how to deal with this kind of accusation, can you tell me how things go in this case? Maybe we should post the link to this thread in the original announcement thread of this token? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2821548.msg28898257#msg28898257