Quote from: notbatman on May 03, 2018, 12:39:53 AM

Quote from: TooQik on May 02, 2018, 02:01:11 PM

Quote from: notbatman on May 02, 2018, 12:23:23 PM

Quote from: TooQik on May 02, 2018, 10:57:44 AM

Quote from: notbatman on May 02, 2018, 10:13:00 AM

^^^ Clown.

The Sagnac Experiment was designed by Sagnac in 1913 for the specific purpose of detecting the aether and was successful in doing so. The result being the Sagnac Effect and empirical proof of the aether.

I know you won't read it notnatman, but for the sake of others who might be slipping into a like mindset, here's some interesting reading: https://briankoberlein.com/2015/08/11/does-the-aether-exist-hint-no/

This article states that the Sagnac experiment proves the aether "A shift in the interference pattern is exactly what the aether model predicts." A direct quote that contradicts the title of the article proves it's misleading and intellectually dishonest.

It then tries to whitewash the result by claiming it didn't disprove relativity because it (relativity) doesn't apply to rotating systems. Dufour and Prunier totally blow this argument out of the water by proving the results are in fact not consistent with relativity:

"Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories" -- https://books.google.ca/books?id=XVLmihZnsvUC

You've just been BTFO asshole.

It's no wonder you believe in a flat Earth, your reading comprehension is abysmal at best or blinded by your one-eyed subjectiveness at worst.

Here's a key point taken straight from the article that you conveniently ignore constantly when the Sagnac experiment is discussed:

"...the Sagnac experiment is inconclusive, since it agrees with both the aether and relativity models."

You've been BTFO, deal with it.

edit:

Lets see if I can clarify the intellectual dishonesty in your linked article a bit.

1. They reference the Sagnac Experiment.
2. They reference two theories:
(a) Static Aether.
(b) Special Relativity.
3. They note the experiment is consistent with both theory 'a' and theory 'b'.
4. They claim because the experiment is consistent with theory 'b' theory 'a' has been disproven.

Can you see what an absolute fuck head the guy who wrote that MSM style article is? Not to mention that Dufour and Prunier proved empirically that special relativity is in fact not consistent with the results, a fact the author omits entirely so can make his intellectually dishonest claims.

edit_2:

The comments in the linked article are gold.

There is no need for stupid experiments that you can't perform. Just take a camera and make a timelapse of the stars, easy evidence there, look through a telescope at other planets or the moon. It is so easy to prove the earth is not flat and yet you don't want to believe it.