Quote from: actmyname on May 10, 2018, 02:20:58 PM

I thought it was a bit confusing in several of your replies but it seems that you don't know you were included into DT2. Given that you most likely don't care and manage your own custom trust settings, it may have been that you thought the attention was just a coincidental period of activity.

No, I don't check trust settings every day and no, I didn't know that I was added to DT on May 03, 2018, 01:22:39 PM when I posted this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3502223.msg36204157#msg36204157, he mentioned green trust member, that topic was about me being alt of theymos because some of digaran's posts were removed from my topic( while the truth is whole topic was trashed) and by all logic "green trust member" is me(because that topic was about me being alt of theymos), and his next post after my was:

Quote from: digaran on May 03, 2018, 02:03:25 PM

Look who just included you on DT2. as always[...]

I was included to DT when exactly?
Before or after my post? Timestamp?
Before or after -ve? Timestamp? 2:47 AM? Undecided

I came that day and went straight to my topic and I saw that digaran accused me that I am alt of cyrus(post has been removed), I replied to other user, I clicked on digaran's recent posts and noticed that he created topic "Need explanation if possible?"(again, asking whether marlboroza is alt of theymos because his posts were removed and other nonsense" which is now "calling out vod for his trust imput" and I replied to digaran's lies.

And look at this http://prntscr.com/jg64cx.

So, lets make this clear again, I came home, I saw digaran posting lies all over the forum, responded and there is no way that I could have known that I was included in DT at that moment. Look at all timestamps.

Maybe troll is causing confusion? Again, that topic is not original topic.

Quote from: figmentofmyass on May 10, 2018, 04:04:14 PM

it was extremely obvious that i was talking about you, hence removing you from my trust network. your flippant use of negative trust completely devalues the meaning of negative trust. just have a look at your sent feedback: i don't give a shit about 99% of what you tag people for. i care about scammers who are stealing/defrauding money from people.

but people who enroll alts in bounty campaigns---they are "scamming" bounties now? lol. 99% of bounties are spam machines for ICOs that are malicious cash-grabs themselves, much more deserving of negative trust. if you think they don't want alts spamming in their campaigns (or the managers aren't enrolling their own alts), you are incredibly naive. they mutually benefit from these alt farms and you know it. the idea that bounties are getting "scammed" is absurd. you're just using these outlandish definitions of "scamming" to circumvent theymos' intent, that the trust system not be used to punish people for spamming.

there is only one degree of negative trust. that means you effectively equate real actual scams where considerable funds are stolen/defrauded, with these alt accounts who are just party to a quid pro quo.

Are you sure you are pointing only at me? Roll Eyes