Quote from: figmentofmyass on May 06, 2018, 05:10:25 PM

Quote from: allahabadi on May 06, 2018, 07:14:54 AM

They are exchanging merits; no doubt, but why make an entire new thread on it?

Is it some novel thing or a shit post that is getting merited? I believe it is the mutual appreciation of art. Unless you can prove that they are alts; I don't find anything objectionable.

because he is a fellow signature designer. it would be preferable for his business if his competition were red-tagged. that's 100% what this thread is about---eliminating his competition. anyone who denies that has their head in the sand.

Quote from: Zpectrum on May 06, 2018, 04:32:13 PM

Quote from: Revenant 02 on May 06, 2018, 03:53:18 PM

I'm done here. I don't need to explain myself anymore. Let the admins do their job. They will act if they see that something is wrong.

You're right, let the admins do their work, i apologize in advance if you thought that this thread was overshadowing your service, i haven't intention of doing it, it was only a suspicion (i think i should have written it in the subject), so i published in meta (Discussion about the Bitcoin Forum). Thanks again for giving your opinion

you know exactly what you're doing and there is nothing honorable about it.

if you provide quality products, you will get customers. PERIOD. if not, go lick the admin's boots and tattle-tale on your competition. that's fucking pathetic. Roll Eyes

Oh my god, you've discovered me, my idea was almost perfect until you showed up ..., Revenant 02 and the others have their own style to make signatures, if customers like their style they'll hire him, we're not selling the same house

I think i understand what you mean, i'll create another account and i'll report them, because if i use my original account they'll think that i am getting rid of the competition...

Quote from: athanz88 on May 06, 2018, 05:30:05 PM

Well, i have said this before, but i want to say it once again. I have seen so many accusation, and sometimes the accusations are well deserved one and some are not and cost the accused of being a person with a wrong tag and most likely the tag is hard to be removed (but i dont have the data for it).

Because of that, i think we need some kind of rules to accuse people, right? Maybe some like :
1. The accuser must use the original account.
2. The accuser can give proof etc of accusation
3. The accused must be noticed and present their proof to counter the accusation.
4. DT/moderators/admin then decides.
5. If the accused is wrong and proved as an abuser or cheater or scammer, then he will be tagged.
6. If the accusation is wrong, then the accuser will be red tagged.

I dont defend anyone in this thread with this post. But really, this thing bothers me a lot. People sometimes just make a new account and start accusing people just by seeing the merit activity and then boom, people got tagged. For the right accusation, it is perfect, but what if it is a wrong accusation but the accused still got tagged? Just see this thread for example, a sig designer accuse 3 other sig designer. Trying to get rid of competitor?

Just my 2 cents.

I'll wait for a DT/moderators/admin to come and decide, if my report is wrong, i willn't complain the negative trust