Quote from: cotiniber on May 06, 2018, 09:29:50 PM

I reported a potential abuse of a bounty manager Anon11073 here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3488441.0
He is the bounty manager of cosplay token and joined the signature campaign of his own bounty on 6th April. After 6th April he made 6 posts by Monday, which is less than the minimum requirement of 10 posts per week. Nevertheless, he gave himself a stake for his first week... He claims that posts before wearing the signature should be included; in this case his posts made between 2nd to 5th April, even though they were posted before wearing the signature, which is why he added a stake. He argues that all the participants' counting follow this rule.

I was not sure if it is normal or not... such a counting rule is not written in the rule of the signature campaign, and obviously it is not logical simply because they were posted before wearing the signature. Finally, while he wrote "all the participants", he is the only person who benefits from this special rule.

Quote from: Anon11073 on May 05, 2018, 03:18:33 AM

There certainly was no other user applicable, but posts when not signed were also counted.
I did not add a rule. If I do a bounty campaign in the future, it will count in the same way.

To me, it looks like he added the special rule only for himself, which is an abuse of his position as the bounty manager, but I was not sure if it is normal counting or not... Any feedback from senior bounty managers/participants would be helpful.

You insist that I added the rules, but the counting method was definitely the same for everyone.
However, I was the only user in this bounty.

I certainly do not think this is fair.
It reflects your opinion. Please check the spreadsheet.

Thank you for pointing that out. I will send Merit to you.