Quote from: deadweasel on November 21, 2013, 05:32:31 PM

Quote from: SgtSpike on November 21, 2013, 05:23:18 PM

Quote from: pankkake on November 21, 2013, 05:13:18 PM

You do realize that not agreeing with someone's policy is not enough to build a court case?
The policy is there, if you don't agree don't use the site. But if you call it "theft", you're a scammer.

I don't think you understand how policies work in court. A court would never uphold a policy that states "I have the right to steal your money," which is effectivly what bitbet's policy says.

Quote from: davout on November 21, 2013, 07:49:54 AM

So the correct course of action for you is :
- Think,
- Understand the why of the policy,
- Get over it,
- Pay more attention next time

Well, I USED to have respect for you, davout. Are you involved in this site in any way?

Look, it's a hardline stance, but they can discourage late betting this way because it's clearly stated on the website and it's a private business that's not forcing you to use it. You have the options to use it or not. If you use it poorly, fuck you.

Snackman got his service provided, because he got the thrill of sending BTC in late, and lost. Now he has the thrill of putting responsibility elsewhere. Service fucking rendered.

Had he read the FAQ, which anyone with a brain in their head would do before sending $9.000, he would know that sending bets in late is still GAMBLING with your money. So, the service was in fact rendered.

Late betting scammers think you can scrape off the winnings of legit users? Nope.

A bet can either be accepted or rejected, how is it a legit action to accept and reject it at the same time?