Quote from: KingScorpio on May 06, 2018, 01:34:10 PM

thanks to roger ver and the successless trial against him

there are now two strategies to challenge bitcoin dominance

1. Creating and Propagating an Altcoin

2. Creating Another Bitcoin and Claiming the other Bitcoin is the Real Bitcoin, dening Bitcoin Cores Lead Role

you guys should better switch to ethereum now as the trend currently goes, you cant win this competition....

there will be bitcoin gold, bitcoin diamond, bitcoin silver etc, all trying to imitate roger vers marketing strategy.

i expect even a propaganda industry to rise that constantly creates new bitcoins and market it as the "true","real", or as ver said "legitimate" bitcoin

regards

your still not getting the big picture..

before the bilateral split. the community beleived that many nodes could happily run on one network and core had no power.
this was done by bing in control of the other node devs.

core and its paid devs got its fundraiser to pay other devs to create altrnate clients.
(gavin is part of the clan.. not against it.. xt/classic were drama events to pretend their was decentralisation and free choice)

so that it would cause drama. purely to incite a degree of the population to start cheering core as a leader. they then went a stage further by starting REKT campaigns to push out any "competition" against core and have the community slowly get used to the idea that core should not have consensus competitors.

and then when core only got 35% vote on a proposal(segwit) the core paid devs had to ramp it up a notch. and get a team to make a bilateral split proposition that threw all the opposers of core off the core network. thus making core a monarchy

gavin and jgarzic (bitcoin cash creators) are funded by the same people that fund gmaxwell and p.wuille.
even the lightning "teams" are paid by the same too.. rusty russel is one example

segwit/lightning is the "product" that the bankers NEEDED activating to control peoples funds. it was not about malleability. it was about multisig control and also part of it still in the works (schnorr) which then hides who the 'managers' are so even the bank2.0 customers dont know who has signing privelidges

this whole last few years was not a throw the sheep into boiling water and see how many jump out and ram the chef.. it was dip the sheep in comfortable water and slowly incrase the temperature until they boil to death without realising.

core have the network all in their protocol controlling hands. core is not just a wallet. they are now deemed as the sole controller of the rules.. they are centralised.

now even if you play the 2 team game of bitcoin core vs bitcoin cash.. to dcg.co it doesnt matter. they own both coins and if bitcoin cash becomes more popular. dcg.co will just transfer dev priorities to manipulate cash.
so see beyond the 2 team game as the two team game is a farse.

above was about the network/protocol....as for the clarity of the currency.
no one should own "bitcoin"
both "teams" should not play the game .. and instead just clarify to users when the user asks for bitcoin. the community should ask
is that bitcoin core or bitcoin cash