Quote from: DooMAD on May 10, 2018, 01:13:37 PM

Quote from: franky1 on May 10, 2018, 03:21:22 AM

Quote from: DooMAD on May 09, 2018, 08:20:35 PM

Still backwards. It's not the Core dev team enforcing that process. It's the users who enforce it by running the code. The fact that most of the nodes are running a Core client strongly indicates users like the way you can't change the rules without going through the moderated IRC/mailing list/BIP process. If a majority of network participants didn't like it working that way, it wouldn't.

core had 35% opposition had 65%
yet the 35% still think that core is the prime network

At one stage those might have briefly been the figures, but BIP91 had over 95% of miners supporting it. Plus, as always, it's not just about the miners, but also about the economic majority.

briefly??
core were stuck at the 35% from december 2016 until august 1st 2017.. (over 8 months)
it only BRIEFLY jumped to 100% once the bilateral split occured UASF and split events were occuring on august 1st+. then for 2 weeks wait period to lock in. and then a further week or so to activate.. thus was only 95%+ for 3 weeks.. and only at that level due to the split
. not due to community desire or economic majority, due to full mining pools support.. but purely due to selective vote counting of only supporters to get 100% and banning the opposition from voting
so please if your going to make a reply. atleast back it up with some damn facts (review the code)(look at charts)
oh and before you ven scream propaganda.. here is a chart from your king(sipa)p.wuiile himself.
notice the orange blur of 20-40% between 01/01/17 and 01/08/17 (8 months). then on august first mega jump to 100% (the blue purple and orange all merge and jump)

come on.. think about it 100% vote happening all of a sudden on august 1st.. thats impossible election result unless they are throwing the count
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver9-small-ever.png

Quote from: DooMAD on May 10, 2018, 01:13:37 PM

Please tell me how you think BCH has an economic claim to that supposed 65% you keep referring to. I could do with a good laugh.

secondly... your missing the whole point..
NO ONE
NO ONE
not core not cash not one has economic claim to brand bitcoin

are you that ignorant of the meaning of decentralisation.

like the dollar if anyone says they want dollar... it must be asked
is that U.S dollar(USD) or A.U dollar(AUD).. like what happens in the fiat world to avoid confusion

if anyone says they want bitcoin... it must be asked
is that bitcoin core(BTC) or bitcoin cash(BCH).. like what should happen in the crypto world to avoid confusion