Quote from: BluRPie on May 11, 2018, 02:30:00 PM

Quote from: RGV on May 11, 2018, 08:35:30 AM

Quote from: BitcoinWhite on May 10, 2018, 08:28:29 PM

We don't deny that as a basis the code for the ASCH project was taken. And it's not uncommon in the IT sphere. ASCH has good technical indicators, so tha's why it was chosen. ASCH has some disadvantages that we improved, the main one is the centralization of the entire network under the ASCH developers, which can not be called a compliance with the ideology of the blockchain. Moreover, to eliminating the shortcomings we make a changes in the logic of consensus among the Nodes (delegates), as well as prepare the creation of additional modules, similar to the DAO module, WhitePay, DEX, etc. Let's not attempt to reinvent the wheel, let's use best practice and improve them.

If its not scam why the developers should stay anonymous ??

Its not privacy coin but DAPP then why should they stay anonymous?

Unless developers show their real identities BTW will treated as scam coin

I thought that anyone in the crypto community has the rigth to be anonymous. It is the best practice:) Do you know that developers of Bitcoin still anonymous?

BTW's market cap at the moment just 1.4 m and I think it has good potential. Sure if it is not scam.

The developer of Bitcoin has done an exceptional job to stay anonymous. The biggest problem with anonymous devs today though is that they usually want to scam people. Satoshi Nakamoto, as far as we can tell for now, didn't want to scam anyone.