Also Gödel's incompleteness theorems which state that no theory of computation can be both complete and consistent, as there will always exist another truth which can't be proven by the existing theory.
Yes, and I'm trying to explain that this applies to
your theory as well. Yet you seem to think that your particular theory is all encompassing -- internally consistent and complete.
I can tell you off-hand that a theory that basically says the universe
is "a multi-dimensional holographic 'doughnut' made of vibrating tines and lots of standing waves", still doesn't explain any of these things:
illusions
consciousness/ego/self
qualia
and of course creativity. Oh wait, those last 3 are all just illusions. Explain illusions then.
You haven't understood what I've presented. My theory explains why and is congruent with that no theory that requires a
logic can be universally consistent. You failed to remember that Gödel's incompleteness theorem applies only to
(i.e. empirical) axioms.