Quote from: bill gator on May 13, 2018, 05:51:18 PM

Quote from: plavirudar on May 13, 2018, 04:10:02 PM

...

As I said earlier though, the method directly addresses the fact that you will bust eventually. That's why I'm trying my luck and seeing if the strategy is enough, in my case, for me to profit and hold me over for awhile. Of course there is a factor of luck and the mathematics are against you, but if that "short-term" is long enough for you to do what this guide suggests to minimize the damage of a bust, control the bust, etc. then you may be okay.

You can't control the bust. Read up on Gambler's fallacy, as that's the exact belief you seem to have. Each bet is independent, and there is no way to change math. Past results have no effect on future results, so any vouches for the method would be useless anyway.
Dooglus did the math a few years ago on figuring out the best way to double your money, and the best he found with a 1% house edge was a 49.652% chance. This method claims to be able to ∞% your money with a 100% chance.

Quote from: bill gator on May 13, 2018, 05:51:18 PM

It's just a cheap little $15 method, and it's honest about what it is offering. There's a script involved, but everything seems to be legitimate from a TOS and legal point of view. I don't see anything wrong with giving it a try, and seeing if their method for handling a bust is feasible.

It's not. It's claiming you can make 25$ to 125$ every day, and that it's guaranteed. Nothing is guaranteed in gambling, and especially trying to bet against a house edge. EDGE_NXTAE, a bot that played proven +EV bets on bustabit was down 2 BTC at one point. OP's method plays -EV bets, but somehow can win with a 100% chance? You can try all you want, but with a -EV, you are expected to lose 1% (if you play against a 1% edge) of your bet, every time that you bet.