Quote from: jimmothy on November 26, 2013, 06:52:15 PM

Quote from: strmir on November 26, 2013, 06:50:28 PM

Quote from: jimmothy on November 26, 2013, 06:45:15 PM

Quote from: Zubilica on November 26, 2013, 06:37:57 PM

Quote from: jimmothy on November 26, 2013, 06:29:32 PM

Quote from: Zubilica on November 26, 2013, 06:17:22 PM

Quote from: romerun on November 26, 2013, 05:35:00 PM

Knc coming with 20nm

this is true they have send a notification

Source?

https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-69

Interesting thanks for sharing. Still not convinced this will result in significantly more efficient chips. As we have seen how AM 144nm tech competes with KNC 28nm, I wonder how 40nm vs 28nm will compare.

There's a notice on the linked page that KnC's 20nm design should reduce power draw per GH by some 30%. That would be somewhere around 0.7W/GH, given that 28nm Jupiter is listed with ~1W/GH (at wall).

Now, IIRC 40nm ASICminer's chip is expected to perform at 0.2W/GH.

Is 0.7 w/gh for knc chip or entire asic?

They list Jupiter efficiency for the entire miner (at wall), I don't know how it's in reality though

. So, I'd say that 0,7W/GH should be for entire miner also. But can not speak for themselves.