Quote from: nwoolls on November 27, 2013, 12:40:47 AM

Quote from: 3KyNoX on November 26, 2013, 11:10:34 PM

Just say that as an idea but if Multiminer could manage from one place (desktop computer, mobile), many mining hardware and / or Rigs (many peoples still uses rigs for ltc or gld), it could be great.

Currently you can use MobileMiner to monitor and control your multiple mining rigs. The future plan is to allow MultiMiner to detect other instances of MultiMiner on a network and allow once instance to control all of them.

Great !

Quote from: nwoolls on November 27, 2013, 03:13:52 AM

Quote from: atomicchaos on November 27, 2013, 02:50:50 AM

Sad to see with so many coming into Scrypt mining now that we're stuck with no more updates. Hoping that the Scrypt fork gets off the ground, wish I still had some programming skills.

In my opinion there's no need for a fork. All that is needed is for someone to contribute to bfgminer. It is only if nobody decides to contribute to bfgminer that scrypt and GPU support will probably be axed from that as well.

There's lots of folks on the Litecoin forum forking cgminer and I get emails from folks also interested in forking. To me it just seems like a much more straight forward and beneficial path to improve the scrypt support in bfgminer.

Personally, as the developer of a GUI miner, I'd much rather just support one miner backend. Version 2.0 will have many more features because I don't have to code to the "lowest common denominator" backend. Even if a fork of cgminer were to become popular and widely used, I'd have to see a significant advantage to switch back to supporting multiple backends.

BFGMiner is great, but saw recently it have some tweaks and improvements and code purposes still required, especially on Mac. It was impossible to make it work last week with scrypt & CPU/GPU on a OSX. LukeJr said coders are free to come and improve BFGMiner on Mac computers.