Quote from: comby on May 18, 2018, 07:29:15 AM

Quote from: kano on May 17, 2018, 02:26:53 PM

Quote from: comby on May 17, 2018, 11:31:09 AM

...
The other pools are growing much faster than kano, thats why kano will get less block by time... Sad

That has zero effect on your reward.

If there are fewer blocks, your reward per block will be higher - for the obvious reason.

Variance is the only relevant point.
As long as the pool is mining enough blocks every diff change then the variance averages out - you get more some months and less other months.
Overall you're paying slush more than twice the fees you pay here - so expected less average reward at slush.

Well, I was comparing april with almost the same hashrate with kano and slush, and slush had a better payout at the end.

You are more talking about "statistics", but well that's not the real life..

... and since you don't have a crystal ball and tell the future - what's your point?

History here shows a pretty good average reward.

Yes you can pick one month and say "Oh My God that month was less" ... you can also pick other months and say "Oh My God that month was more"
Neither mean much in the big picture.

Quote

The first 8 days of May there was only 1 block found at kano, so that MUST be fixed with finding more blocks within a shorter timerange..

I will give another try with kano for sure, but if you see how the hashrate in the network grows, kano is growing to slow?!

Again, as I said, pool size isn't relevant.

Quote

Variance is the only relevant point.
As long as the pool is mining enough blocks every diff change then the variance averages out - you get more some months and less other months.
Overall you're paying slush more than twice the fees you pay here - so expected less average reward at slush.