Quote from: Roobotics on November 29, 2013, 08:08:57 PM

Quote from: Current C on November 28, 2013, 04:58:49 PM

Can someone explain this to me. This is copy pasted from https://mining.bitcoin.cz/stats/.

20957   2013-11-26 15:52:43   0:02:35   12301112   1191   0.00238445   271627   25.10929891    confirmed
20956   2013-11-26 15:50:08   2:06:37   621115370   48184   0.00216099   271626   25.31762960    confirmed
20955   2013-11-26 13:43:31   4:16:28   1269260019   37362   0.00000000   271612   25.06672930    confirmed
20954   2013-11-26 09:27:03   6:10:40   1798179211   177845   0.00265711   271587   25.35120125    confirmed

In line 20955, block number 271612 I have a zero payout, but I also obviously mined the block before for over 6 hours, that one for over 4 hours, and the one thereafter for 2 hours.

Why is this block paid at zero? I emailed info@bitcoin.cz already 2 days ago. Ive had no response.

This concerns me because I'm providing shares to the pool and someone somehow is getting a payout for this block, I checked it on block chain, it was certainly mined by slushes pool.

What am I missing here?

On the 20955 round you provided significantly less shares than the other rounds, It it likely this happened all towards the end of the round because later shares are weighted more, this prevents pool-hopping. You actually missed out on the beginning of the 20956 round as well. Your ratios as far as (submitted shares/all shares) are as follows:
Round#:   Ratio:
20957   96.8e-6
20956   77.5e-6
20955   29.4e-6
20954   98.9e-6

But basically you missed so many submissions towards the end you were rounded down to zero by the pool hopping mechanic. The only way to earn shares in Slushes is to be there when the round completes by a fair margin.

You're right.

But the OP's question has been answered quite well only 4 (four) posts above your one:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1976.msg3754997#msg3754997

And with the apt remark, that It was explained in this forum to people x times before.

I'm not sure whether it's really necessary to repeat the answer again and again. Yes, you have added some apt numbers to the answer, but anyway...