Quote from: Real-Duke on Today at 01:35:11 PM

Quote from: Greshamsches Geld on Today at 01:33:16 PM

Wie sind eure Prognosen? 500K?

Eher etwas bescheidender Wink

Ja, da bin ich auch bescheidener, in dieser "Runde" erwarte ich auch eher einen Wert um 100K.

Quote from: Real-Duke on Today at 01:35:11 PM

Aber die Erklärung von "damals" gefällt mir auch ganz gut dazu:

Quote from: OhShei8e on November 30, 2013, 04:18:02 PM

Ich muss sagen, ich bin immer wieder erstaunt wie genau sich die Macher (aka Nakamoto) das alles überlegt haben. Denn bei einem Wert von einer Million hätte Bitcoin in etwa den Wert, den er braucht, um bei einer Stückzahl von 21 Millionen als Weltwährung zu fungieren.

Das war tatsächlich laut "offizieller" Stellungnahme von Ray Dillinger der Gedankengang:

Quote from: Cryddit on October 12, 2014, 03:28:14 AM

I remember this discussion, actually.

Finney, Satoshi, and I discussed how divisible a Bitcoin ought to be. Satoshi had already more or less decided on a 50-coin per block payout with halving every so often to add up to a 21M coin supply. Finney made the point that people should never need any currency division smaller than a US penny, and then somebody (I forget who) consulted some oracle somewhere like maybe Wikipedia and figured out what the entire world's M1 money supply at that time was.

We debated for a while about which measure of money Bitcoin most closely approximated; but M2, M3, and so on are all for debt-based currencies, so I agreed with Finney that M1 was probably the best measure.

21Million, times 10^8 subdivisions, meant that even if the whole word's money supply were replaced by the 21 million bitcoins the smallest unit (we weren't calling them Satoshis yet) would still be worth a bit less than a penny, so no matter what happened -- even if the entire economy of planet earth were measured in Bitcoin -- it would never inconvenience people by being too large a unit for convenience.