Quote from: vampirus on May 24, 2018, 08:01:55 PM

Most likely it was 51% attack like recently in BottleCaps.
But I also found this in official code:

Code:

Old and good parameters:

static const int64_t nGenesisBlockRewardCoin = 10000 * COIN;
static const int64_t nBlockRewardStartCoin = 5 * COIN;
static const int64_t nBlockRewardMinimumCoin = .011 * COIN;

New version with wrong parameters:

static const int64_t nGenesisBlockRewardCoin = 1 * COIN;
static const int64_t nBlockRewardStartCoin = 2048 * COIN;
static const int64_t nBlockRewardMinimumCoin = 1 * COIN;

Can you elaborate, please?

Quote from: zeewolf on May 24, 2018, 07:10:15 PM

I transferred some OFF to cryptopia succesfully, nothing is wrong. Just some misinformation on Cryptopia.

Are you absolutely certain there's no 51% attack? There has been a huge dump on Cryptopia which could be the cause of double spends, and the nodelist on the website isn't very comforting as every node is on a different height according to it.