Quote from: paramecie on May 25, 2018, 12:14:30 PM

Quote from: naska21 on May 25, 2018, 07:40:56 AM

Then let me make this as simple as possible. Imagine for a moment that in front of you two cell phones. One of them is a kind of cutting edge technique while the other one has only a single button functioning, nothing else. Developers of the last persuade you to get their phone and promise that eventualy it will function as it should be. Which one will you take?

Yes, that's the whole problem with MNX.
In their White Paper the main argument is that it's supposed to be stable, but it went from 32$ to 8$, it went down even more than BTC itself!
While this, they reply "It's because the features aren't all implemented".
Yes, the cell phone with one button.

We had a prototype of atomic transaction nobody cares and can use; while an Android wallet would be something that in 2018 thousands of people would use, but no, no, no, we don't get this.

Many little things were asked for in this forum - but I don't see any change that has been demanded, including a fix or an improvement in MinexBank.

Even simply a list of existing pools in the front page of the main site is a no, no, no, no, and no.

They don't even reply to an email.

The team is nice, the project promising; but they just do what they want.
It's well known that's not how to get customers.

See the current market cap of the MNX: it's at its lowest since november 2017.
We were less than 90th on CryptoMarketCap (first page!) - but we're now... 260th.
That may be the result of this politic.

This isn't FUD: i'm still fan of it, but I'm deceived.

Yeah, still not sure why they seem against updating the list of mining pools on the OP and the website. On a side note, I like Minex coin a lot, but with the big drop to 260 and some of the other issues already listed, I don't see Binanace being one of the two exchanges Minex is going to be added to.