Quote from: paduser on May 25, 2018, 09:03:25 PM

That what's written in the wiki

Quote

While this address format has been included in some implementations, as of December 2017, the address format is not recommended for use until more software supports the format.

source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bech32

But anyway I will try to use the bench32 + SegWit until I hit an insurmountable resistance. Thanks

Ah yes, but that was 5 months ago, when it was certainly the case. And still the case if the services you use can't support it. Bech32+SegWit definitely the way to go for now. Electrum is what I'd recommend, since the client supports spending/receiving either.

Quote from: tarball on May 26, 2018, 01:06:33 AM

https://btc.com/ supports searching bech32 format addresses.
This is the transaction.
https://btc.com/c9c8ae8395f7888afbe17272a4647f13588e538a4800a66db38b59d547b5d421
This is the receiving address.
https://btc.com/bc1qg6cl5mm9dxx47tfzttkeacp75pul9egrqefj6r

Unfortunately, btc.com takes a while to load.

Blockchair's the most suitable explorer I've found, and it keeps improving with analytics.