Quote from: positiveoutlook on May 28, 2018, 07:39:13 AM

Quote from: Memmoria on May 27, 2018, 09:03:54 PM

Quote from: SpockSenior on May 27, 2018, 07:16:27 PM

Quote from: LudiMax on May 26, 2018, 06:44:11 PM

Quote from: MrKurh on May 26, 2018, 05:58:11 PM

Quote from: GREATKINGRAT on May 26, 2018, 05:30:23 PM

Quote from: cmdr1 on May 26, 2018, 09:31:42 AM

Quote from: constructive_criticism on May 26, 2018, 09:12:36 AM

Quote from: Tyrant76 on May 26, 2018, 08:29:10 AM

Is this for radiology only,or other fields of medicine can use it too?

It was designed for radiology and is now optimized just for that, but if the project takes off there is no reason to go into other fields.

In this case they would probably need to branch out with the team members. They would also need to get some experts from other fields.

Some further development of the platform should not be questionable if the project is successful.

It will not be doubtful, it will be normal. Given the competition and modifiable standards, the project should be able to reforming. Otherwise, it can be superseded. However, this depends on the intensive work of the team, and definitely, this is in their intireses.

Understandably, a well reprogrammed platform can be easily upgraded if needed, this implies a simultaneous extension of the team

I read in the witepaper that the team plans to expand with the number of team members, specifically developers, sometime in Q3. This means that they have long-term plans of expansion which is always a good thing.

I think they did the right thing by starting with smaller team, and then they can add new members when needed

That always seems like a good approach to me. Smaller teams have more dynamic which is really important at the start and then later as the business grows - you can always bring fresh ideas in.

it can also make more room for token allocation to team members and reduce the risk of token dumping.