Quote from: KingScorpio on May 31, 2018, 07:14:46 PM

Quote from: carlfebz2 on May 31, 2018, 06:27:37 PM

Quote from: seetha on May 31, 2018, 05:37:29 PM

Quote from: KingScorpio on May 31, 2018, 05:33:52 PM

Quote from: seetha on May 31, 2018, 05:21:38 PM

Quote from: carlfebz2 on May 31, 2018, 04:54:14 PM

Quote from: seetha on May 31, 2018, 12:30:22 PM

We are an young and energetic team of 7 looking for an angel investor to become part of our initial phase of funding for an sports betting exchange which will go out for an ico soon. The angel investor can become the co founder of the project

So, you are basically finding an investor? - Angel investor sounds new into my ears.
Have you considered or do see on how many sports betting sites in the market today? I see you are really confident with your strategy but giving out guarantees isnt really appealing on my side.

Year dear i agree with you and your question.... there were many cryptos out there when etherium has launched ... yet it came from all the bottom and occupied as the queen of cryptos because of its unique utility feature.... the same way i do believe that only betting industry has always lotted the punters but they never gave anything back in the industry.... this is where our unique strategy works and can make us achieve bigger hieghts in this industry because it is an highly untapped industry of 22 billion dollors yearly revenue...

it's not a good idea, to get a venture kapitalist on board they are horrible and want to own everything you are basically selling yourselves with this.

So what do you prefer me dear to the initial funding and smart contracts funding dear? We need few nominal funds to get this project on floor which can easily gets funds for development from ico.... our idea and small team is all we have now at the moment...

Then why wont make an ICO and showing on what you proposed for? If the community will able to see the idea and do have the potential then accumulating and getting investors wont really be a problem. You cant make the project to be built with just having a 1 or 2 investors even if theres someone joined but i dont think they would risk it big for the sake of project completion.

well and then compete with 35.000 alternative icos? oh and not to mention those that are founded by the rich and their banksters that buy their own coins with printed millions and billions publicly to tell everyone how awesome they are and how big loosers the others are.

its best to do as much as possible without funding, and only if necessary take a funding. best thing there is, is a team, that believes in the project they are building.

After all these years engaging or knowing about crypto and ICO's we do really able to see the advantage on having these things.Yes, competition is really very fierce considering the current number of projects in the market as of now but you can really have your possible top spot or awareness of your existence if your project do really have that uniqueness among others.Therefore,losing out hope shouldnt really be on our minds or thoughts as a project owners or developer,if we do believe that we have potential on raising funds with the current market then theres no wrong to go for it.