Quote from: bitrebel on December 11, 2013, 08:05:24 PM

Quote from: jjtech on December 11, 2013, 07:51:01 PM

Quote from: bitrebel on December 11, 2013, 06:46:27 PM

Quote from: instacash on December 11, 2013, 06:39:40 PM

Quote from: bitrebel on December 09, 2013, 07:11:18 AM

In comparison, I bought 41,000 Quark coins for my 5.5 bitcoins. I bought them at approx. .12 cents and they increased to .16 cents
My take today from Quark coins was $1640, while those same 5.5 bitcoins would have only netted me $550.

I bought 31940 QRK at November 23 (only 3 weeks ago). QRK cost 0.00000057 a piece then. I paid 0.0182 BTC.
As I'm posting, price is currently at 0.00024948, which means they're at 7.96 BTC. (43636%)
This is ridiculous Cry

I would be crying hearing that, if I did not stand to make a fortune, too.
I increased my supply recently.

The nice thing is, the Capital i invested in Quarks was all profits from bitcoins. Only a fraction of my profits, too.
Now i'm making money off virtual money instead of hard earned capital. Cool

Timing is everything in this world.

But you realize that it's nothing but a gamble?

Every single business decision in life is a "gamble".
In fact, millions of people gamble with their money in the banks everyday. Some get it all stolen.
The issue is how much the odds are stacked in your favor. That's what matters.

If Bitcoin needs to go to $1600 right now, to double people's current investments into profits, then take a look at how far Quark must move to accomplish the same thing.
Is it likely Quark will fall below .25 and stay there, or is it likely to go to .50 cents sometime soon. The gamble is also whether bitcoin will drop in value. Bitcoin is not likely to increase right away, by substantial margins. That would mean another 12 Billion would have to be invested for it to become worth $1600 each. The current market cap is pretty high for the amount of use it currently has in the marketplace based on vendors accepting it etc. Quark, on the other hand, is primed to go on the Chinese exchange soon, and it's heavily promoted by Keiser and Still, both respected in the underground and alternative news scenes. Quark is very likely to rise past .50 cents soon. So, it's practically no gamble at all. It's more like taking candy from a baby. Cheesy

I disagree that every single decision in life is a gamble. Maybe to certain extent and smarter people limit this extent to maximum of their capabilities. It's either you have developed a system based on some sort of technical analysis of the market or you gamble reading tea leafs. This is what I meant. I actually made some money on QRK too, but just because it was a part of my system, that I'm testing now.