Quote from: DarkStar_ on June 03, 2018, 03:09:52 PM

Not entirely accurate, off the top of my head I had to do a double round once and payments were delayed twice (?)

The participants were paid at the end of the day. The participants had no problems with the payments being delayed one day because they trust you. Thank you for being honest, I'll try to edit the post when I get back home.

Quote from: hilariousandco on June 03, 2018, 03:44:23 PM

How about including rank and/or sign-up date?

All the campaign managers are hero members at least. The list is already too big, I had to delete a column(the one stating about other campaigns being handled by managers) because the list became too wide.

Quote from: hilariousandco on June 03, 2018, 03:44:23 PM

In this case I think the highest value people have held at any one time is a better indicator. Somebody could quite easily hold on to many small amounts dozens of times until his total is 10 bitcoins or whatever then just disappear if anyone every gives him a large amount at once.

I don't think anybody in the list will risk all their reputation and run away with a few bitcoins. But still I'll make changes to that column, and add the highest amount escrowed at one time to the list.

Quote from: hilariousandco on June 03, 2018, 03:44:23 PM

You should probably remove the part including theymos (unless he's said otherwise). He may trust me to moderate the forum at a Global level but this doesn't necessarily mean he would vouch for me to hold onto large amounts of cash (or run signature campaigns - not that he doesn't or wouldn't but I feel unless he's specifically said this it shouldn't be here and may give me an unfair advantage).

Very well.

Quote from: The Pharmacist on June 03, 2018, 03:59:37 PM

Props for this nicely-presented list, pugman. I honestly did not realize there were this many bitcoin-paying sig campaigns still in existence.

I've had good experiences with Yahoo62278, Lutpin, and DarkStar_. All of them are honest and straighforward and run their campaigns quite well. I can't speak for the other managers, since I haven't participated in any of their campaigns, but I haven't heard any complaints about them--and that speaks volumes. Anyone who aspires to be a campaign manager would do well to try to emulate how these individuals operate.

Haven't heard much about SMAS lately. Is that list still being updated? The number of spammers certainly hasn't decreased by any means. I think SMAS was one of the best proactive measures to come along in quite some time.

Quote from: DarkStar_ on June 03, 2018, 03:09:52 PM

Not entirely accurate, off the top of my head I had to do a double round once and payments were delayed twice (?)

Must not have been in months, because that hasn't happened since I've been a part of the Chipmixer campaign.

Thank you for the kind words. Yes, SMAS is being updated, atleast by yahoo62278 and Lauda.

Quote from: shahzadafzal on June 03, 2018, 04:10:58 PM

good work @pugman I guess the delay has paid off... finally you have well sorted list of campaign managers.

One question what is this Advertisement space for? Are you going to put your own advertisements here or will be from bitcointalk?

Because this is normal post page and default ad from bitcointalk, after first post will automatically be displayed.

The delay was because I was typing fast, I somehow deleted the entire page, luckily I had saved half of the page in word. So I had to retype again. Embarrassed

The advertisement is for anybody who wants to advertise their business. I expected that this thread might get a few more views than the normal threads of bitcointalk. Credit goes to Mitchell for that. Cheesy

Quote from: hilariousandco on June 03, 2018, 04:12:30 PM

Yeah, it's just way too misleading as it is. Also, very hard to validate and I have absolutely no idea how much money I have held over my lifetime here (and I suspect the others don't and are more likely to be estimates). Anyone could just make a figure up if it's not validated, but it's fairly easy to confirm the total amount someone has held at once and I think that is a more telling figure as that's a figure they have previously been trusted to hold on to. I think listing figures like hundreds of bitcoins could easily mislead or confuse people. Probably should be listed in fiat as well for the reasons I mentioned before.

I understand how it could be misleading. I am sorry for causing the confusion here. What I meant was how much have the campaign managers paid out their pastime throughout their campaign management experience. I'll change that info in a few hours. I am currently not near my computer.