Quote from: NeuroticFish on June 04, 2018, 07:38:22 AM

Quote from: crishjovi on June 04, 2018, 05:41:58 AM

Any way we can change the best case scenario from "stellar" to "supernova" or something else that doesn't share its name with another cryptocurrency? I keep doubling over and laughing in the middle of reading comments!

First of all, I don't know how to qualify this post. I did some research and I've found that word used in the way you say only in 2016 and I think that you expect too much if you think that people will change their way of talking (especially such old posts) just because they make you laugh.

Second, the usual word for that is "moon". And no matter, really, since in a couple of years all the words we could use would already be taken by some - good or bad - coin. And what then, people will have to change all the posts and use no words, since they are coin names?

So.. yeah, great idea, keep it up!

It's a fucking Sig spammer.

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on June 04, 2018, 12:30:47 PM

Quote from: MinersRus on June 01, 2018, 03:58:57 AM

Quote from: BldSwtTrs on May 29, 2018, 08:34:07 PM

Who are the genius who decided to fork the POW algo?

I applaud said genius (which was the community by the way) because when they forked the ASIC's to the curb the profitability went from a paltry $0.56 per kHs to the current $1.18 kH/s. Even with the depressed price it is still double the profitability.

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/monero-mining_profitability.html#3m

https://bitinfocharts.com/monero

Why do you think it's a good thing when mining profitability is high?

Don't you think network security is a more important metric?

I don't think you understand that centralizing network hash with ASICs is detrimental to network security.