Quote from: Jaguar0625 on December 12, 2013, 11:49:07 PM

Quote from: wizzardTim on December 12, 2013, 02:51:50 PM

Quote from: wizzardTim on December 12, 2013, 02:47:46 PM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on December 12, 2013, 02:40:44 PM

Quote from: wizzardTim on December 12, 2013, 02:34:06 PM

His disappearance and making it look like a scam was part of the agreement too?

Now, reading that he was going to follow Satoshi's footsteps, I think he was planning to disappear.

Anyway, "look like a scam" =/= "is scam".

I agree. I just say that due to this behaviour I missed my chance to become a stakeholder. And it's sad, cause I really like NXT.

EDIT: Hope he gives us another chance

How about if you, and all big shareholders perform another round of re-sharing NXT to all of us in exchange for BTC?

More crowd - more spread - more attribute - more success

That's a great idea. This has been said before, but I think the initial, single offering has hurt NXT significantly. The community is good, but it will be interesting to see how the aftermath of the recent drama plays out.

I agree that the early stakeholders should be rewarded for the risk they took, but I think, at this point, their reward is disproportionate to their risk. I think a better solution would have been to have funding rounds instead of a single buy-in. A funding rounds approach would be similar to how startups get money from VCs (e.g. Series A, Series B, etc.). Each subsequent round could raise more money with a lower payout, but really help to get people involved.

How would you do that without creating new coins?