Quote from: scolary23 on June 05, 2018, 04:07:49 PM

Quote from: comradepay on June 05, 2018, 07:08:08 AM

Quote from: Celendion on June 03, 2018, 02:59:48 PM

Quote from: comradepay on June 03, 2018, 06:29:22 AM

Quote from: scolary23 on June 02, 2018, 02:19:35 PM

Quote from: comradepay on June 02, 2018, 03:00:03 AM

Quote from: taibas on May 29, 2018, 11:36:47 PM

Quote from: vendorLazy on May 28, 2018, 04:15:48 PM

Quote from: comradepay on May 26, 2018, 06:58:47 AM

All right. This is an investment to support the development team. The developers so answered for questions about why the price of the token would grow

Yeah I understand, that investments are a huge support and boost to the development process, however we all looking for a profit

It is likely that more should be concentrated on the project's development, and hope that the team will be able to produce what they have conceived. Otherwise, it will not profit, not us not them. For this reason, I am waiting for their product. Until then this all has not a definite form.

The finished product - it is good. But we all already understand that the current economy of the token is not optimal. The team already needs to think about how to improve it

Yes it is. But I'm afraid that these are mainly the problems of investors. The team raised funds for their production. However, in white paper, the use of their token is stipulated. I do not think that they will deviate from the documents that they themselves provided. If everything is will do as planned, the token will function. To know this for sure, we need to see the product.

The token will function, but will not give the expected profit to investors. The token economy is very poorly developed. It needs to be improved. I don't think investors will mind that

100%, that investors will not object, against the expansion of the functionality of the token. Cheesy

But it is unlikely that they will do this. Without expanding the activity of the token, the dev do not violate anything.

For the team, it would be over easier to leave it as it is, but if the project will bring losses to investors, then its reputation will not be good

The project itself consists in the production of a certain product. If the team succeeds in this, then their reputation will be pretty strong. And if they do not violate the terms of white paper, then who will be able to show them any claims.
But we do not know yet whether the scope of using the token is sufficient. Maybe that will be enough.
Although at first glance this is not enough.

If they do everything according to the whitepaper, of course there will be no claims to them, but it is already clear that the economy of the token needs to be improved