Quote from: twmz on December 13, 2013, 06:52:04 PM

Quote from: ||bit on December 13, 2013, 05:24:15 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on December 13, 2013, 10:53:43 AM

Why so much attention in pandering to those who just want to trade the stock?

It's not a stock. And it's questionably a bond.

Anyway, I don't think there is too much attention allotted to those that want to trade the bonds. Some would like to sell, but the price is very depressed. Why? It seems in-part because it can't be easily traded. Evidence of that is just looking at the price pre- and post- Bitfunder. So, if a person decides to sell now, they are forced to take a deeper loss because of a lack of a any easy/fast trading procedure. Why should someone that merely changes their mind on a holding be required to sell their position for a loss in-part because the way to trade it is only a little better than making a craigslist posting?

+1

That's me in a nutshell.

+2, I made a similar post a few pages ago. Someone brought up a good point, the incentive to setup an easy trade procedure isnt there since the LRM funds have already been raised, and the company as a whole isnt affected by the current buy/sell price. I think we can all agree that having a more automated method of trading bonds would both sell the "LRM direct" bonds much faster, and entice more buyers and sellers to get involved. Ive been with LRM since the beginning, and dont plan on selling for a while, but knowing the valuation of the bond was still somewhat retained when i do decide to sell would make me much more comfortable.