Quote from: PeterHarrisonCY on December 14, 2013, 02:49:12 AM

Quote from: crumbs on December 14, 2013, 02:23:53 AM

Quote from: PeterHarrisonCY on December 14, 2013, 12:34:55 AM

Quote from: crumbs on December 14, 2013, 12:30:44 AM

Quote from: PeterHarrisonCY on December 14, 2013, 12:20:39 AM

...
So people, get your facts straight before raging at people that are trying to voluntarily help ease the situation.

"I am your friendly bitcoin banker and I am here to help you."
-pirateat40
-TradeFortress
-Ukyo
-Danny

I know Danny personally and I know that he is a well-intentioned person. How can you compare Danny to someone like pirate? ...

Just like i did above. Each one of those people was known and rabidly defended by the community -- way past the point when it was obvious to everyone that they have been scammed.
If a scam doesn't seem 100% legit, it's simply a shitty scam.

pirate was only 'known and defended' by the community who knew him on the internet - nobody claimed to know him in RL or else the FBI wouldn't take so long to find him. If you really think NEO-BEE is a scam I would suggest you sell your shares (which you probably already did) and leave this discussion, many people already blocked you for the same reason: you keep alleging and pointing fingers at someone for something that didn't happen and that they didn't do and have no intention to do.

If you have BTC tied up in BF and WeEx would you rather try to recover them yourself or would have someone help find a solution? And if you want help to find a solution, why blame the person trying to help?

I'm gonna make a mock scenario to emphasize my point: Josh is a homeless man in New York. Sam is a random passerby who wants to get some money for Josh to feed him and he promises him that he will come on Monday with $100. Instead, he shows up with $80 on Tuesday. Does Josh have the right to be angry at Sam, or will he show him deep appreciation to him?

First, you are wrong. Many users have personally met pirateat40, his identity was well known. It still is. Just to keep this factual.

Regarding hypothetical scenarios: Danny is not a random passer-by either to those invested in his bank or to the scammed WeEx users, who delayed taking legal action due to Danny's promise that Neo & Bee is working to resolve the matter & everyone should sit tight.
So the more fitting hypothetical here is Josh being robbed, and Danny telling him "cops won't get your money back. I'm friends with the d00d who robbed you & will get it back for you."

As you can see, not only does Josh have the right to be angry at Danny but Danny is fully implicated and legally liable.
Hope i have cleared things up for you.