Quote from: loup on June 07, 2018, 04:02:30 PM

Quote from: greatteager on June 07, 2018, 03:39:54 PM

Quote from: ParRus on June 07, 2018, 11:46:36 AM

Quote from: pynetx on June 07, 2018, 11:36:27 AM

Quote from: Amelie Poulain on June 06, 2018, 11:34:57 AM

Quote from: pynetx on June 06, 2018, 10:57:49 AM

Quote from: Jepli on June 06, 2018, 10:46:05 AM

Quote from: bitcoin-shark on June 05, 2018, 07:50:17 PM

shame about the low value of the investments collected so far the project is very valid and promising, maybe they really had to set up marketing in another way, maybe with some reviews of famous youtubers...

I guess they should have tapped famous crypto endorsers to make the project well known among the community and it will surely result in a good ICO outcome.

Well, soft cap is reached but they should add more efforts into the marketing area which can further fetch more investors.

It seems to me that their mistake was that several times they delayed and extended the date of ICO, investors do not like uncertainty.

Investors understand everything but at least they should be there to make them understand. They lack good communication.

Now there are not so many ICO projects that are able to raised soft cap, so it result is good for beginning.

Now everyone is trying to get into the best projects and in the middle projects no one wants to risk in such an unpredictable market.

Maybe that's one of the reason of the result but I really thought that this was a good one.

You cannot be sure 100% what project will be bad and what will be good, you can only rely upon your own thoughts and feelings. No one, even the devs themselves, is not sure about the future of a certain project, because it's like a lottery.