Quote from: heavyarms1912 on June 08, 2018, 01:32:18 PM

Quote from: MaxMidnite on June 08, 2018, 01:25:01 PM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 08, 2018, 01:22:37 PM

Quote from: MaxMidnite on June 08, 2018, 01:14:33 PM

I know there more juice to this miner!

I'm using the latest 1.5.9 with 6x RX580s.
On Claymore 11.3 DevFree I get about 5200 H/S
On this one I get about 4890 H/S if lucky.
Something is not right, I think the kernel settings need tweaking or not working correctly.

Not sure why lower hash on some of the cards with same settings?

[2018-06-08 14:11:25] GPU0: 843 H/s [T: 56c, RPM: 2179, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:5]
[2018-06-08 14:11:25] GPU1: 773 H/s [T: 65c, RPM: 2124, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:1]
[2018-06-08 14:11:25] GPU2: 804 H/s [T: 60c, RPM: 2020, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:4]
[2018-06-08 14:11:25] GPU3: 784 H/s [T: 64c, RPM: 2132, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-06-08 14:11:25] GPU4: 843 H/s [T: 53c, RPM: 2883, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:2]
[2018-06-08 14:11:25] GPU5: 843 H/s [T: 43c, RPM: 2992, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:6]

If you're compare with Claymore - you use v7 algo. Isn't it?
You must set right intensity in SRB for your cards, not auto. On Claymore you also not got max speed...

Thanks for the reply.

Yes its V7 algro, I always used auto setting.
Do you have recommended Intensity setting? not sure if you have similar setup?

For RX570/RX580
If 4gb cards. 59 intensity, wksize 8, dual threads
If 8gb cards 114-120, wksize 8, dual threads

Hi man + others

Thanks for the info, these are my new set of results; (double threads = true)

I cannot push this over 86 with 80 being most stable (5200+ hash)

ALL CARDS ARE 8GB

"gpu_conf" :
[
   { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 1, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 2, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 3, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 4, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0},
   { "id" : 5, "intensity" : 86, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "kernel" : 0}
]
}

[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU0: 896 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 2187, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:5]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU1: 842 H/s [T: 72c, RPM: 2128, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:1]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU2: 848 H/s [T: 60c, RPM: 2031, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:4]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU3: 852 H/s [T: 63c, RPM: 2127, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU4: 893 H/s [T: 54c, RPM: 2918, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:2]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] GPU5: 893 H/s [T: 44c, RPM: 3036, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2175 MHz][BUS:6]
[2018-06-08 15:09:52] Total: 5224 H/s

If I do I get this error:
Error CL_MEM_OBJECT_ALLOCATION_FAILURE when calling clEnqueueNDRangeKernel for kernel 0 for DeviceID 1 (Thread 3)