Quote from: Hideyoshi on December 16, 2013, 02:37:06 AM

Quote from: deisik on December 16, 2013, 02:08:52 AM

Quote from: Hideyoshi on December 16, 2013, 01:57:12 AM

It is not my view that is being imposed on anyone. You are confused about anarchy. Anarchy does not mean that anarchists remove the rules that your government imposes on everyone, and replace them with rules that anarchists impose on everyone. Anarchy means that each individual decides what he wants to do, and each individual is free to try to impose their own rule on someone else. There are no anarchy rules to impose. That is why it is called anarchy. It is up to each individual to have good morals and logical ethical position.

This form of anarchy I call the only true Anarchy, and this is not what most "anarchists" here would consider as anarchy. So you would go for a sort of heretic among them...

That is anarcho-capitalism as I understand it. You can do whatever you wish, so long as you are aware of consequences of your action, and everyone else is free to react to your actions as they wish, without relying on law or police to tell them how they must react. How is my anarchy form different?

Probably some of them would come here and clarify on that point themselves, but the main difference as I see it is that people in those anarchists' incarnation of anarchy would willingly choose to impose on themselves a sort of a law system and strictly abide by the set rules. The problem with such society, in my opinion, is that it would always be divided into majority and minority. And as one of the proponents said, the minority would have to either adjust themselves somehow or "go away"...

To me, this kind of anarchy is not much different from what state does. If you disagree with the law, you either run away or go to jail