Quote from: DarkStar_ on June 13, 2018, 10:00:41 PM

Quote from: digaran on June 13, 2018, 09:21:05 PM

I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.

Why is it wrong? From theymos himself (who you believed should have 100% control the trust network):

Quote from: theymos on September 09, 2015, 02:52:37 AM

It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.)

Well my don DarkStar_, theymos said that to avoid kicking DT members from their positions all the time, but if you see that a DT member has a habit of countering only some feedbacks and not some others, it could result in favoritism and eventually a total misuse of default trust.

Let us take the case of Anduck, if we could agree that Vod has tagged Anduck out of despite and foolishness, what we need to do is to ask either Blazed or some other DT who has a green tag on Anduck to re-enforce a previously left green tag on Anduck to counter Vod's unjust feedback and also a DT member has to tag Vod for his misbehavior if we are going to counter Vod's feedback.