To my own simple understanding of how stealth address work, a stealth address is a way to let someone pay money to somewhere that the receiver can find and have the public and private key for. The payee provided information for the stealth address such that they can determine the public and private key but payer can only determine a public/receive address. The payee didn't specify that exact receive address but can scan a valid range to find it based on a shared secret between payer (sender)and payee(receiver). The mechanism is designed so that only the payee will have the private key of the destination address.

I'm going to throw this out there. A stealth address is a way to let someone pay money to somewhere that the receiver can find and have the public and private key for. The payee provided information for the stealth address such that they can determine the public and private key but payer can only determine a public/receive address. The payee didn't specify that exact receive address but can scan a valid range to find it based on a shared secret between payer and payee. The mechanism is designed so that only the payee will have the private key of the destination address.

this is not to weigh pros and cons of 2 side. instead I want to check out the economic incentives created by the introduction of lightning network(foreign).the first part will provide an overview very quickly on the structure of foreign with some examples of use cases the real world, highlighting the sacrifice faced by users in the network. this is done by explain the first what channel payment and then men-scaffolding on it to introduce the foreign.
community bitcoin in 2017 into the community and bitcoin cash appear to strengthen the split ideology core.
"blocker small" who believe in keeping size limit block 1mb and only allow growth end up to 2 or maybe even 10 but not carried away with block size increase. they believe that blockchain bitcoin must be a layer of the final settlement but transaction micro can occur on another layer, only to be completed later in the chain of the main. technical solutions them to take this to bear almost released: the lightning network.

The purpose of this article is not to weigh up the pros and cons of the 2 sides. Instead I want to examine the economic incentives created by the introduction of the Lightning Network (LN). The first section will give a very quick overview of the structure of the LN with some examples of real world use cases, highlighting tradeoffs faced by users on the network. This is done by first explaining what payment channels are and then scaffolding on top of that to introduce the LN.
On the other side are the “small-blockers” who believe in keeping the block size limit at 1Mb and only allowing eventual growth to 2 or maybe even 10 but not getting carried away with block size increases. They believe that Bitcoin’s blockchain should be the ultimate settlement layer but that micro-transactions can happen on another layer, only to be settled later on the main chain. Their technical solution to bring this to bear is close to being released: The Lightning Network. They believe that by implementing another layer on top of the existing blockchain, the block size limit will allow for thousands of more transactions per second per Mb.