Quote from: AnonyMint on December 18, 2013, 02:38:00 AM

Quote from: MaxwellsDemon on December 17, 2013, 10:24:42 PM

Quote from: AnonyMint on December 17, 2013, 10:15:31 PM

Anthropogenic global warming has been proven to be a fabricated lie.

... and this is why these people get banned.
If educated people want to have a serious scientific discussion, it's perfectly reasonable to have a few troll-free places for them to do so. I agree that a subreddit can be a private place.

By the way, climate change deniers always remind me of this:

http://www.theonion.com/articles/christian-right-lobbies-to-overturn-second-law-of,281

I was waiting for a complete retard like you to stick your neck out so I can obliterate your ignorance with irrefutable facts.

Of course you are too stoopid to understand the facts presented below.

Quote from: AnonyMint on December 13, 2013, 03:34:54 AM

The carbon tax is all about a global Technocracy where the elite will track everything you do (e.g. Smart Electric meters...to save the earth of course!), and tax you into slavery.

Quote from: knarzo on December 12, 2013, 04:18:37 PM

Quote from: AnonyMint on December 12, 2013, 10:40:56 AM

This is what a carbon tax with the lie about man-made global warming is about.

Did your Exxon Attorny Daddy tell you that or do you honestly believe that firing millions of tons of fossile products has no impact on our climate? The only lie is the carbon tax which just helps greedy Exxon&Co to make more money. Bloody bastards!

I haven't spoken to my father since 2003. Before 2000, I hadn't spoken to him much since 1990 (when I was 25). So don't think my father and I see eye-to-eye on all issues. My father went much higher than West Coast division attorney at Exxon. I am not really clear how high up he went because that was after we stopped communicating. I recognize his intellect.

Any way, that is irrelevant to my views on ClimateGate and the other complete fraud of man-made global warming (read the 27 comments of "Shelby" on the linked page).

Here is a sample comment:

Quote

@Bennet, can you read? I wasnt arguing against GW (global warming vs. AGW which is anthropogenic, i.e. man-caused global warming).

I will ask you though if you passed a basic statistics course, because how can you draw any statistically meaningful conclusions of doom based on recent century or two, when then lag time for CO2 correlation is 600 1000 years, and they were farming grapes in the UK and then skating on the Thames within the past several hundred years.

Do you also believe in Peter Pan, Three Little Pigs, and peak oil.

Fear shuts down the pre-frontal cortex.

See also these links documenting the AGW fraud, such as how they fabricated temperature data, and even moved thermometers from shady locations to next to concrete mass in direct sunshine to falsify the data:

https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aesr.ibiblio.org+AGW

http://blog.jim.com/category/global-warming

Since we've established above that knarzo thinks man-made carbon could influence the climate, when in fact the carbon produced by man is dwarfed in orders-of-magnitude by the carbon released from the oceans as they warm 600 - 1000 years after the warming begins! (as documented above), then we can consider his recent tirade in this context of his ignorance:...

Well, let me ask you this.

How do you ban the so called 'climate denier' while also banning the hysterical fanatical warmer? Or is one okay and the other not?

RE bolded above, of many things I could say here is my choice: WHAT IS MAN CAPABLE OF 600-1000 years from now? (and NO, your one liner does not adequately represent the science on this issue of long term climatic effects of ocean warmth, and please do not forget, nothing wrong with averting an ice age...)