Quote from: pixel8or on June 16, 2018, 11:25:20 PM

I did some casual comparison with HanaPool and a couple others. Granted, I, and my humble 2x GTX 1060 rig, may not be the best suited for such a task, but I'm noticing HanaPool payments are considerably lower than WeekendPool and SmithPool... like, by half.

Hanapool sample (average one hour):
https://s19.postimg.cc/924oie0tf/Hana_Pool_Pmts01.jpg

WeekendPool sample (hourly payments):
https://s19.postimg.cc/c8z820djn/Hana_WEPPmts01.jpg

Am I missing something, or is HanaPool a serious waste of hashpower?

Hi pixelator,

We haven't had this reported before.
From having a very quick look, I can see weekendpool.net has 62 miners. From memory, weekendpool miners are the total workers connected, not accounts (not sure if this has changed in the last few days). Hanapool has 60 connected miners (these are accounts, not workers). So when hanapool wins a block, it will be split between more accounts. I suspect this is the reason for the lower quantity.

We have been working on an issue with miningcore(the pool software) where the pool hashrate returned in the API is displaying higher than it should for Lyra2REv2. It doesn't affect the underlying hash it is a multiple applied to the display only. Here is a link to the issue: https://github.com/coinfoundry/miningcore/issues/211