I can accept that you and others don't want to understand the design that exists in all things.
If you can provide evidence I will sure understand it, just claiming that other things are designed because they are it's not an argument.
If you can provide evidence for lack of design, I will surely understand it. Just claiming that things are not designed because they simply are not, is not an argument.
It's always like that for you, isn't it. Why should I provide evidence for things that are not designed? You are assuming that everything is designed for no reason, I'm not the one trying to prove god you are.