Quote from: mdayonliner on June 19, 2018, 07:18:39 PM

No mate, I did not even bother to see the whole project since yahoo was the signature manager.

So if yahoo was starting a campaign that promotes killing puppies, you would join that based on the fact it is managed by yahoo?

Quote from: mdayonliner on June 19, 2018, 06:41:34 PM

Wrong! I care that's why when I pick up a campaign I try to go with manager who have good reputation. This way, I do not need to do much study before picking up a campaign. A good manager does the job for me. I could do that for myself but it just I don't spend much time on picking up a campaign. Is there anything wrong trusting a manager who has good reputation already in the community?

Well, yes.
Let's take the off chance that yahoo's account gets hacked and it isn't noticed (while the chance might be very low since yahoo uses a strong password and doesn't do stupid things, it does exist).
Now the hacker (prentending to be yahoo) launches a campaign that promotes, say a phishing version of WalletingServices (used to reclaim forked coins, currently running a forum ad, thus reputable service),
that phishing version pretends to be WalletingServices, but is only set up to steal private keys from users.
Would you, based on the fact that this campaign is managed by whom you believe to be yahoo, join the phishing campaign without doing any kind of research?
At that point, you'd be an accessory to the scam due to sheer stupidity and lazyness.