Quote from: Joel_Jantsen on June 20, 2018, 02:30:31 PM

Quote from: escalante28 on June 20, 2018, 05:27:08 AM

There are so many bounty managers here but do we know who to choose? I am suggesting here that what if, bitcointalk.org must have an accredited "Bounty Managers" ? Those bounty manager must under go on,

Who decides that? We don't want to centralise the forum than it actually is.

Quote from: escalante28 on June 20, 2018, 05:27:08 AM

1. Verification, the purpose of it is to know if that person really exist.

No. Pretty sure people love anonymity and let's keep it that way. From what I have seen, managers willing to dox themselves over bounty management would be the incompetent ones.

Quote from: escalante28 on June 20, 2018, 05:27:08 AM

2. Capable, in managing the project and has a complete team members because he/she can't handle it alone.

Again, who creates such metrics ?

This is only a suggestion sir, We, in the low rank division was the most affected here. Why? It's because we wanted to earn more like high ranked members. So we do accept lot of bounties even how stressful it is. We do accept bounties with a minimal review if that said bounty was legit and most of us rely on the ICO review. We know that we don't have lot of experience of how to distinguish a legit ICO. My suggestion was to minimize a wannabe bounty manager to lessen a scam project. If the scam project will continue , what will happen to us on the future? Scam project will discourage lot of investor. Investors will decrease and ICO will have a hard time to promote those coin.
My suggestion will benefit lot of individual is either you're a bounty hunter, bounty manager or a investors.