Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Is it legal to give a negative trust to a 'BM' who ended a scam project?
by
escalante28
on 21/06/2018, 11:41:13 UTC
If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.


How come that the bounty participant deserve to have a negative trust by participating a scam project? In the first place, participant give their trust on the bounty managers, second, bounty managers must examine their project carefully by conducting a verification on the team members of that project before accepting it and lastly, bounty participant didn't get paid by promoting a scam project.

Why the hell participants are closing their eyes in evaluating the project and only Bounty manager is responsible for the scam projects.
If participant know it is a scam project , participant should make aware BM that project looks scam and give time to BM to respond or abandon the project.
If participant concerns are valid and BM is not responding or co operating then participant  should immediately leave the project and  open a scam accusation against BM and let the community decide then.


NEWBIE MUST NOT PUT THEIR EFFORT IN VAIN!!!![/b]

@OP , Look like you are less concerned about scam , more about your Bounty payment.




Less concerned about the scam? seriously? This suggestion is for the good for the good. If we can give a negative trust to the BM then the percentage of wannabe BM will lessen and the most experienced and have the knowledge will remain because they are protecting their name and reputation. Don't be hypocrite, we are participating bounties because we want to earn. I know those BM didn't force us to join their project and I know that the bounty we join that ended up in to a scam can't be blame all to them it is because both parties has a lack of evaluation of the project they joined.

Let me ask you this, What will happen if the scam project will continue? Do you think it will not affect to lessen an investors? Do you think scam project is healthy in our world? If that will continue and increase the volume maybe the ICO will have a hard time after that Ico will be gone.


Scam project cannot be determined from that start, it is noticeable at middle of the project. After you already invested your time and effort.