Quote from: piramida on December 21, 2013, 06:35:47 PM

Quote from: porc on December 21, 2013, 06:12:30 PM

Another Hero member, shaming posters who disagree with bitcoin. If somebody is posting bullish price projections you applaud from the sidelines. So transparent.

No shaming, it seems logical when people believe in what they are saying and can back it up. You are stating certain bold predictions about bitcoin price, which seem outrageous at the moment, but you have nothing to back it up, therefore trolling? We need to establish that

You see, while it might seem to you that your position is somehow fresh or original, we here witness trolls going back to 2011 who declare bitcoin as dead just because they can't understand the idea. None so far was ready to back it up with something substantial, though. Needless to say, none was right so far, too.

We will see who is right. My price prediction (below 10 dollars) is only consequential, as I dont believe Bitcoin will work. I have backed up my statements with reasoning (provided in the two links above). You might believe that my arguments are not substantial, however that is only your viewpoint. People who were invested in the housing bubble or the Nasdaq stock market bubble, also thought that there were no substantial counter arguments. Otherwise they would have divested.

You do engage in shaming tactics, as you immediately brand mark bears as trolls and state that I dont back up my statements, even though I have provided 2 links with detailed reasoning (and you can find even more if you browse my post history). This attack line is something you reserve for bears.

In this thread I have described a switch in mentality which I anticipate will take place in future. It is a speculation thread. Detailed back up for my position is provided in the economics threads (and these are easily identifiable via the post history). Thus the following statement ("Your topic would have much more weight than a fart in the water that it is now.") is a a shaming tactic.

Even more absurd is the previous poster, who criticizes my arguments from his high horse, while not even grasping their content!